FANDOM


  • why did you undo my change in the food page. I explained my change in the comment section. You did not. Please explain.

      Loading editor
    • From my view; deleting about a full artical of text cause it "didnt match up" to your own game is not the way to handle wikis; but to update the text to be correct

        Loading editor
    • These are blantantly wrong. They get deleted. If someone else has correct info they can add it. This is exactly how a wiki works. "The way not to handle wiki" is to prefer wrong info over no info.

        Loading editor
    • Please undo your undo.

        Loading editor
    • the infomation is correct; the value is wrong; you change the value not delete the infomation

        Loading editor
    • the information is already in the wiki. right above the part we are arguing about.

        Loading editor
    • The part I deleted is redundant and wrong. please undo your undo.

        Loading editor
    • There is no arguing happening here; i fixed the single conflicting value that you had the urge to delete a whole section about

      contining to request that someone redo your edit to purge infomation could be consided vandalizing now

        Loading editor
    • You sir, have problems. Back to wiki topics. The values are still wrong and conflic with values given in the section above where we are arguing. Undo you undo.

        Loading editor
    • The training value is mentioned in this page, TWICE. one is obviously wrong, I deleted it. then someone undid it without comment, and you call me a vandal?

        Loading editor
    • You do have a point there. It's not nice to revert one's edits without explanation. We have yet to know why Astraltor did that, but it's definitely not right. Especially since you've explained your reasoning. It would have been better if only certain parts of the cut would have been restored (potential gain being independent of hunger, for example).

      For future reference, if a value listed is demonstrably false, it's preferable to delete the value only, and say "unknown amount". In this case, "increase the potential of their two related stats by 2% an unknown amount".

      Since Zeofolium fixed the 2% to 40%, this part can be considered taken care of (thanks Zeo!). Other wrong values should be handled the same way.

      Let us all keep in mind that the wiki is not perfect, and we all are doing our best in our own way to get it right.

        Loading editor
    • I am not sure where the 40% came from, but it conflicts with the value, 1000, given about half a page above where 40% is mentioned.

      The value was not only false, the correct value is already in the wiki. That's part of the reason I deleted it. And I still believe it should be deleted. because the value give conflicts with what the wiki said just a paragraph before.

        Loading editor
    • testing with elonsnack says 40% is right, then what's with the other value, 1000 ?

        Loading editor
    • oh, my bad, that's training stats, not potential

        Loading editor
    • Hi A Fandom User, 

      i undid the edit because it removed the entire part about raising potential, would have been a loss of information rather than just being incorrect value.

      sorry for the non-explaination in the undo revision, it was reactionary and hasty

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message